Quantcast
Channel: #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc
Viewing all 12885 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Outside the box: a different view on roulette numbers

$
0
0
And I'm not sure if it makes sense to over-complicate things this much, you could never do these calculations in a real casino. Without a tracker it would be hard enough just to keep track of cycles and defining elements.

Well I don't think it makes much sense to limit systems to what you can do in a real casino, if you can play online.  ;)

Re: Outside the box: a different view on roulette numbers

$
0
0
I just see it.
Zero will probably kill this strategy.
I am surprised and, after 10 k spins, I am still a plus on the wheel with zero
But unfortunately it is only +34 units
And the profit no longer grows.

Re: Outside the box: a different view on roulette numbers

$
0
0
However, it seems to me that the wheel with La partage rule.
It is within the reach of the profit
My trigger is simple, completely to play in the BM casino.
Only here is the time, if it would work rather in the game, RNG enters, otherwise the game will take ages.

Re: KTF, is just like living in Paradise

$
0
0
In your first post Notto you state that in the end the FOBT "knows" your bet selection.

This is total nonsense.

Re: Outside the box: a different view on roulette numbers

$
0
0
ATI
Now looking at your chart.
If you still have a file with settings, and you want to optimize the results, playing EC add the simplest 3 step positive progressions 1-2-4, after losing always return to 1 unit.

I would still be grateful how exactly you described how you selected the High / Low choice.
Because unfortunately I do not understand it

Re: Sector 15 Repeater2

Re: Sector 15 Repeater2

$
0
0
Example Bias find 12 spins

You put bets 30 8 23 10 5 24 and you get second tryout bet hit when 10 come, can continue same numbers or track new numbers and bias.

Re: KTF, is just like living in Paradise

$
0
0
Well general
Lotsa people make money off  nottos teachings ....much better than the law of the third crowd of HINTERS ......and lets not forget the greatest fallacy .....VADDIS ....... ba ha ha

I tested KTF extensively last year. It’s the only method I have felt confident enough to play for real money.

I played 134 games for only four losses. KTF is generally very reliable, although it’s possible to get hit with a bad run where it’s impossible for your bankroll to recover. 

I implemented a stop-loss of 200 units. This worked for me. It would take an average of 8 games to get the bank-roll back on par after a loss.

Notto is always very helpful. Unlike a lot of people he doesn’t speak in riddles.

Re: KTF, is just like living in Paradise

$
0
0
Say 100 people use the same system.

50 lose quickly and move on.

30 win for a while, and think the system is great, until they lose.

15 win for much longer, and think the system is great, until they lose.

5 win for a year or so, and think the system is great. They tell all the doubters they're wrong, and they defend the system. Until they lose.

See the pattern?

Almost every system is just random bets, and the player thinks theres some workable logic to it.

Re: KTF, is just like living in Paradise

$
0
0
And really i admire nottos efforts and sharing. No problem there. But it's in vain because, like most systems, they make the same mistakes. Its not hard to understand why. It is explained constantly.

Re: Ignatus 100k spins passed

Re: Ignatus 100k spins passed

$
0
0
Congratulations for saying that.

The very real and sad fact is that the author is a roulette veteran of over a decade and still cannot grasp this or other simple facts such as sky is blue and grass is green.

This is an accurate measure of the level of ignorance and stupidity we are up against.

Hoping to help here. Ran a test over 200k recorded spins.
There were only 4449 instances where a dozen hit 4(or more) times in a row. There's only so much i can test!
Here's the breakdown of the results:
Instant win after 4th dozen hit: 2988 wins
There were 1461 instances where the dozen carried on running after 4 hits:
Losses before win:
1   x1012
2   x319
3   x89
4   x30
5   x8
6   x0
7   x2
8   x1

After a loss you would have to triple your bet to keep going, so expect to need a big enough bankroll to do so.
With a bank of 242 units you can carry on for 6 spins with this progression:
1, 3, 9, 27, 81

But IMO based on the above, for 4446 wins @ 1 unit a win will only get you a total of 3723 units (if you bet up to 6 spins, making 3 losses of 242 units)

Not worth it.

But still keep up the good work IG. Love your ideas

EDIT: Math

Re: Ignatus 100k spins passed

$
0
0
Keep up the good work??

What on earth are you talking about?

It's total nonsense, every single one of these so called systems by Ignatus (and there are hundreds of them across every single roulette forum on the Internet) are all exactly the same repackaged bullsh!t.

Wait for a trigger even though its been mathematically proven for over 100 years that triggers don't exist and make absolutely no difference to anything.

Then if so called trigger occurs then bet using a long and lengthy progression again something which has been mathematically proven to ultimately lose.

Then finally the same defence that it's only meant to be played hit and run where once again it has been mathematically proven for over a 100 years that hit and run is exactly the same as one long continuous session.

It's completely absurd nonsense and you should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself for supporting it.

Re: Trend following system for roulette

Re: Trend following system for roulette

$
0
0
No, I have not heard that every hedge fund manager and professional trader can go to a casino and make money.

As I'm extremely well read and educated I can only assume the reason I've never heard this is because you're lying.

Re: Sniper 6

Re: Sniper 6

Re: Sniper 6

$
0
0
Did a short testings 40 Live-sessions... (only tested 500 spins/game) and? in 20 games only 1-2 losses (that didn´t pass 300 spins)... That would be then 18/20 wins; a 90% winrate.

Re: Sniper 6

$
0
0
well? To be realistic then ..more testings out of 20 sessions 4 lost, second 10 sessions 2 lost etc, so, i believe about a 75-80% winrate would be expected ... (for a 300 spin session, that is).

Re: 24 out of 36

$
0
0
Best thing you can do: it's only 36 spins, so run a session and calculate.  See your plus and minus and count the amount of nrs that hit.
Viewing all 12885 articles
Browse latest View live