I believe I don't understand quite well how exactly multiple games should be played together.
Normally I would think that ok, let's play the arithmetic progression on 9 number sets for colors as one game, and do the same on hi/lo as another game. Then you wrote this:
So it's obviously not the right way of combining games together, but isn't this example on colors and dozens are also two individual games? http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15938.msg138657#msg138657
How about this? I play 9 number sets to catch an AP on R and B. Within the same 9 numbers, I know that either red or black has to appear at least 5 times (no zero), so I'd bet on a color that has already appeared 4 times. Would this be a better way of playing multiple games?
Or this example is what you really mean by playing two games? If so, then my question is, is it possible to keep track of 4-5 games without a software?
Normally I would think that ok, let's play the arithmetic progression on 9 number sets for colors as one game, and do the same on hi/lo as another game. Then you wrote this:
Quote
betting on all 3 ECs don't help on variance. [...] Playing all of them together is nothing but playing three individual games together leading to negative expectation.
So it's obviously not the right way of combining games together, but isn't this example on colors and dozens are also two individual games? http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15938.msg138657#msg138657
How about this? I play 9 number sets to catch an AP on R and B. Within the same 9 numbers, I know that either red or black has to appear at least 5 times (no zero), so I'd bet on a color that has already appeared 4 times. Would this be a better way of playing multiple games?
Or this example is what you really mean by playing two games? If so, then my question is, is it possible to keep track of 4-5 games without a software?